Providers
What is the Linq iMessage API?
Linq sells a communications API covering iMessage, RCS, SMS and voice. It states SOC 2 Type II compliance, advertises a 99.95% uptime SLA, and lists group chats, tapbacks, read receipts, rich media, FaceTime scheduling and Find My location sharing. It does not publish pricing — access is through a sales conversation after a free sandbox.
How to read this
Linq is not in our provider comparison because we have not run a paid line with them. Everything here comes from their own public pages, checked August 2026, and is labelled as their claim where it is their claim.
What Linq actually sells
- iMessage, RCS, SMS and voice through a single API and one contract.
- Group chats, tapbacks, read receipts, typing indicators and rich media.
- FaceTime scheduling and Find My location sharing — unusual, and genuinely differentiating.
- A stated SOC 2 Type II posture and an advertised 99.95% uptime SLA.
- A free sandbox with a temporary test number, before any sales conversation.
Pricing is not published
Linq quotes through sales. Competitor comparison pages cite figures around $250 per line plus a four-figure setup fee — that is a rival's characterisation on a page written to win the deal, so treat it as an order of magnitude rather than a quote. The published prices across the category.
The full write-up, and how to evaluate it.
What it does
- Send and receive iMessage programmatically, with RCS and SMS fallback and automatic routing.
- Group chat creation and management — materially harder than one-to-one, and missing or partial at several competitors.
- Tapback reactions, read receipts and typing indicators.
- Rich media, plus delivery of interactive iMessage apps.
- FaceTime calling and scheduling, and Find My location sharing.
- Real-time webhooks across all of it.
The claims worth verifying
SOC 2 Type II
Compliance posture stated on their site
Source: linqapp.com
99.95%
Uptime SLA they advertise as contractual
Source: linqapp.com
<120ms
Median latency claim
Source: linqapp.com
Vendor claims, not our measurements. Ask for the artefact: the SOC 2 Type II report under NDA, and the SLA text with its remedy clause. A report that exists will be produced within a day. How to run that evaluation.
Why it is also called Linq Blue
Linq began as a digital business card company and moved into communications infrastructure. "Blue" distinguishes the iMessage channel from the RCS, SMS and voice channels sold alongside it — but you will not find a separately priced product by that name. It is one API.
What that means practically
- One integration, four channels. If you genuinely need iMessage *and* RCS *and* SMS *and* voice from one vendor, that consolidation is the actual pitch.
- One contract and one compliance review, which is the point for a procurement team.
- No à la carte iMessage pricing is published — the platform is quoted as a whole.
- Fallback routing is theirs to handle, since they own every channel in the path.
If you only want iMessage
Buying a four-channel platform to use one channel is usually the wrong shape, and cheaper single-channel providers exist. The pricing comparison puts the options side by side.
Who it fits
| Situation | Verdict |
|---|---|
| Enterprise procurement with a security questionnaire | Strong fit — the compliance posture is the product |
| Regulated industry needing a DPA and an SLA | Strong fit |
| An AI agent product needing group threads | Good fit, and explicitly targeted |
| A three-van home services company | Wrong end of the market — start here |
| You want a price before a sales call | Poor fit — Photon publishes theirs |
The week-long test
- Open the sandbox first. Linq offers one free, with a temporary test number. Do this before any sales call.
- Send 20 messages a day for two days to real recipients who expect them. Log every send and every delivery event with timestamps.
- Measure delivered rate, not API uptime. Under 95% at that volume is a warning, not a fluke.
- Break it deliberately — a landline, an Android number, a malformed number. Check the errors are distinguishable and documented.
- Test inbound. Reply from three phones and confirm every webhook arrives, verifies and is idempotent.
- Email support with a real question at a normal hour and time the reply. You are buying that response time as much as the API.
The questions that matter
Ask before signing
- Send the SOC 2 Type II report under NDA — and what period does it cover?
- Is the messaging infrastructure in scope, or only corporate systems?
- What are the documented rate limits, in numbers per minute and per day?
- What is the SLA remedy when it is missed, and what is excluded?
- What happens to our numbers if we leave?
- What is your median delivered rate, and your p10?
The caveat no vendor resolves
Apple publishes no iMessage API. A SOC 2 report attests to a company's own controls, not to Apple's permission, and every provider here — Linq included — reaches iMessage by means Apple has not sanctioned. The structural position.
Calling it from Node.js
const response = await fetch("https://api.linqapp.com/v1/messages", {
method: "POST",
headers: {
Authorization: `Bearer ${process.env.LINQ_API_KEY}`,
"Content-Type": "application/json",
},
body: JSON.stringify({
to: "+19998887777",
text: "Your 2pm window is confirmed.",
webhook_url: "https://acme.co/webhooks/imessage",
}),
// Without this, a hung provider hangs your request handler with it.
signal: AbortSignal.timeout(10_000),
});
if (!response.ok) {
const retryable = response.status === 429 || response.status >= 500;
throw new ImessageError(await response.text(), response.status, retryable);
}Node 20+. The retryable flag is the important line — see below.
Calling it from Python
import os
import httpx
_client = httpx.Client(
base_url="https://api.linqapp.com",
timeout=httpx.Timeout(10.0, connect=5.0),
headers={"Authorization": f"Bearer {os.environ['LINQ_API_KEY']}"},
)
def send_message(to: str, body: str, callback: str | None = None) -> dict:
response = _client.post(
"/v1/messages",
json={"to": to, "text": body, "webhook_url": callback},
)
# 429 and 5xx are worth retrying; a 422 for a recipient not on iMessage
# will fail identically forever, so route those to your SMS fallback.
response.raise_for_status()
return response.json()A module-level Client reuses the TLS connection — worth it against an API you call thousands of times a day.
Names it gets confused with
Blooio, Miss Blue, Texting Blue and Project Blue are separate companies — "blue" is unsurprisingly common in this category. The directory disambiguates every name we could find.
This page also answers
- linq blue imessage api
- linq imessage api evaluation review
- linq tech services company imessage api
- linq tech services company imessage api python
- linq tech services company imessage api node.js
Further reading
Go deeper
Linq Blue iMessage API
Linq sells an enterprise iMessage API with a SOC 2 Type II report and an uptime SLA. Here is what the product actually does, what is public about pricing, and who it is genuinely the right fit for.
9 min readComparisonsLinq vs Sendblue
Enterprise compliance posture against public documentation and mid-market pricing. Which of these two you should choose is mostly decided by who has to approve the purchase.
8 min readOperationsSOC 2 and iMessage APIs
Which providers claim SOC 2 Type II, what that report does and does not cover in this category, and the questions to put to a vendor when security review is the thing blocking you.
9 min read